Windell Travel and Windell Hotel’s both claim that they did not have a contract with Jack because he was a minor at the time of his dealings with Bailey and that they are therefore not responsible to Bailey, and the contract was void. Can Jack refute this argument? How so?
Which contract law will the court most likely apply in making a decision in Bailey’s attempt to recoup her trip costs; common law or the UCC and how will it affect the remedies she can obtain? Explain.Which contract law will the court most likely apply in making a decision in Bailey’s attempt to recoup her trip costs; common law or the UCC and how will it affect the remedies she can obtain? Explain.