Why would the given be a more socially optimal solution


Problem

a. Why is it that a carbon tax is preferred to either a Btu tax or a gasoline tax when the objective is to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions?

b. Instead of enacting a carbon tax, assume that Congress decides to provide tax incentives to non-carbon-based energy sources, such as solar and wind power. Would this instrument be cost-effective in reducing CO2 emissions?

c. Now suppose that the government chooses to initiate tax incentives for these energy alternatives along with the carbon tax. Would this be a more socially optimal solution? Explain briefly.

The response should include a reference list. Double-space, using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Macroeconomics: Why would the given be a more socially optimal solution
Reference No:- TGS02105293

Expected delivery within 24 Hours