--%>

Why womens movement took a risk by arguing for the suffrage


Problem: Some leaders in the women's movement took a risk by arguing for the suffrage, or vote, as a "safe" issue rather than full equality, saying that they would use it to clean the nation's house and institute reforms such as child labor and Prohibition. Do you agree with the tactic of using the vote to change government in order to better society? Why or why not? Again, what are the benefits and limitations. Whether or not you agree with this tactic, what role does securing and exercising the franchise/vote play in removing corruption from government and assuring that governing is of, for, and by the people? Need Assignment Help?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Why womens movement took a risk by arguing for the suffrage
Reference No:- TGS03461751

Expected delivery within 24 Hours