Why the criticisms make the authors contention shareholder


1) Why the criticisms make the author's contention shareholder just passive impotent beneficiaries valid as to tangible property?

2) Is the mechanism of management being assigned the authority to resolve conflicts among stakeholder giving management even more discretion than allowed under the shareholder theory to make self-interested decision, which confirms that they cannot be trusted? if yes- why? if no-why ?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Operation Management: Why the criticisms make the authors contention shareholder
Reference No:- TGS02921173

Expected delivery within 24 Hours