Why the court got correct and explain why court was wrong


Justice Problem

For each problem in business law, students should utilize the IRAC method. Introduce the concepts from a particular week, state the Rule of law making sure to include all elements of any law, Analyze the problem using both the facts of the case and the rule of law and finally make a Conclusion on the problem that week.

As you learned, the bankruptcy code is vast and it can be widely interpreted. Sometimes provisions within the constitutions itself can create conflict in applying the bankruptcy code, especially to state agencies that may assert state's right under sovereign immunity. In 2006 the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided in Central Va. Community College v. Katz by a narrow margin of 5-4 that the state's sovereign immunity did not superseded the intent of the bankruptcy code. Therefore, a state agency cannot use sovereign immunity as a defense from being sued by an individual due to the responsibilities in the bankruptcy code.

In your problem explain why the court got this correct AND explain why the court was wrong. Lastly, if you were the 10th justice how would you vote and why?

The response should include a reference list. Using one-inch margins, Times New Roman 12 pnt font, double-space and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Why the court got correct and explain why court was wrong
Reference No:- TGS03110111

Now Priced at $35 (50% Discount)

Recommended (99%)

Rated (4.3/5)