Report Issue
Please write a 2500 words paper about "Why should multi-criteria analysis based methods provide any better answer than a comprehensive cost benefit analysis method that takes into account the various externalities?"
Please read all the materials I uploaded. The question is about how multi-criteria analysis is better than cost benefit analysis.
Please provide case studies to support this idea in the paper (One case must be Mongolia case from the reading)
Most of the resources should come from the materials.
Because the essay should be Harvard style, please paraphrase the quotes from the reading.
Readings
1. A critical review of multi-criteria decision making in protected areas By Mónica de Castro and Vicente Urios
2. CHAPTER 6- Sustainability and the Capability Approach: From theory to practice? By PB Anand
3. Developing a multi-dimensionalenvironmental vulnerability (MEV)indicator for Mongolia By P B Anand
4. Developing a multi-dimensional environmental vulnerability (MEV) indicator for Mongolia By P B Anand.
5. Textbook - Multi-criteria analysis: a manual.