Problem
A. Why selective humanitarian intervention often considered problematic? Which would be preferable, selective intervention or consistent nonintervention?
B. Would other nations ever be justified intervening in U.S. domestic affairs to prevent what they perceive as violations of human rights?
C. How does the doctrine of a "responsibility to protect" reflect and extend traditional arguments of humanitarian intervention?
D. Why is the doctrine of popular sovereignty so central to the case of humanitarian intervention?
E. Why does the United Nations play such a large role in debates over humanitarian intervention?