Why is mullerian mimicry considered true evolution while


Why is Mullerian mimicry considered true evolution, while Batesianmimicry is slightly debatable? Is there a way, in Batesian mimicry,that the mimic can affect the evolution of the species it is mimicking? Would you think that is normally a positive or negativeeffect?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Biology: Why is mullerian mimicry considered true evolution while
Reference No:- TGS0799253

Expected delivery within 24 Hours