Problem
A. Contrast Immanuel Kant's definition of radical evil with Hannah Arendt's definition of radical evil(i.e., explain how they are different).
B. Explain precisely why Baudrillard thinks that the spirit of terrorism is "everywhere" rather than a geographically specific phenomenon. Do you agree with Baudrillard on this point? Why or why not?
C. Why does Immanuel Kant think that we can never be certain that any of our actions are morally good actions? Do you agree or disagree with Kant on this point? Explain your answer to this second question either way.
D. "With friends like Job's friends, who needs enemies!" (This is an expression that basically communicates that friends are not doing what they should be doing as friends, but are behaving in ways that are more like the ways enemies behave). Explain how someone might reach this conclusion upon reading the Book of Job. Do you agree with the conclusion? Why or why not?