Why do you consider mishandling or faulty forensics


Assignment task: WATCH

YouTube Video: Trial Of The Century | FULL EPISODE | The New Detectives

THEN ANSWER:

Millions watched on television as the jury rendered their verdict. Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson was found not guilty of murder. Forensic scientists reconstructed the events that took place on the night Nicole Brown Simpson was murdered. But was their report accurate and could the evidence be trusted?   In your post, please identify 4-5 instances, where there may have been mishandling of evidence or the case by the police/forensics team.  Based on your knowledge of physical evidence and collection, why do you consider this mishandling or faulty forensics? Or, if you believe that there was no mishandling of the evidence/case, please explain your stance.  Do you agree with the jury's verdict?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Why do you consider mishandling or faulty forensics
Reference No:- TGS03250153

Expected delivery within 24 Hours