Please read the "Disbarment of Lawyers" case (under “Thinking Critically About Relevant Legal Issues”) on pages 201 and 202 in the Kubsek text and answer one of the following questions:
Which of the four ethical norms (from p. 8 of our text) is central to the court’s decision in this case? (Do not provide a list of the ethical norms – just choose the one(s) you feel answer the question.) If you've chosen the same ethical norm as another student, make your post as a reply to theirs so we can keep the posts about the different norms together.
What fact seems especially powerful in shaping the court’s reasoning?