Assignment: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay
The assignment is divided into three parts.
For Part I of the assignment, you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the Webtext.
In Part II of the assignment, you identified, presented and evaluated two arguments, one supporting your own view, and one supporting the view that you don't agree with.
Part III - Synthesizing and Writing
Write at three to four page paper in which you:
1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
2. Identify the strongest argument that supports your position in the debate. Present the argument and evaluate it (do it in an essay form, and so, differently than what you did in Assignment 1.2). Do the same for the strongest argument supporting your opponent's view. Which argument is stronger and how can we assess that?
3. Explain your answers to the "believing game" questions about the three premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
1. The answer should be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
2. The response also include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
3. Also Include a reference page. The Citations and references should follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.
Attachment:- Chaveda-Willis-Assignment-1.rar