When should a court grant summary judgment


Question 1: When should a court grant summary judgment? Explain.

Question 2: Mark Womer and Brian Perry were members of the U.S. Navy and were stationed in Newport, Rhode Island.

On April 10, Womer allowed Perry to borrow his automobile so that Perry could visit his family in New Hampshire. Later that day, while operating Womer's vehicle, Perry was involved in an accident in Manchester, New Hampshire. As a result of the accident, Tzannetos Tavoularis was injured. Tavoularis brought this action against Womer in a New Hampshire superior court, contending that Womer was negligent in lending the automobile to Perry when he knew or should have known that Perry did not have a valid driver's license. Womer sought to dismiss the action on the ground that the New Hampshire courts lacked jurisdiction over him, citing the following facts: (a) he did not live in New Hampshire, (b) he had no relatives in New Hampshire, (c) he neither owned property nor pos-sessed investments in New Hampshire, and (d) he had never conducted business in New Hampshire. Did the New Hampshire courts have jurisdiction? Explain.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: When should a court grant summary judgment
Reference No:- TGS03239224

Expected delivery within 24 Hours