Question: This is a youtube video that I have to analyze and answer the next questions: Jordan Peterson Debate On The Gender Pay Gap, Campus Protests And Postmodernism (Video)
- What's the author's thesis (claim)? Is it logical?
- What's the author's purpose in writing this essay?
- How effective does the author present the claim and support that claim?
- Is the piece aimed at a particular audience? A neutral audience? Persons who are already sympathetic to the author's point of view? A hostile audience?
- How does the author's essay reflect the three appeals: logos, pathos, ethos?
- What's the author's tone, persona (voice)? Is it appropriate?
- What assumptions does the author make? Do I share them? If not, why not?
- Does the author ever confuse facts with beliefs or opinions?
- How convincing is the evidence?
- Are significant objections and counterevidence adequately discussed?
- To what extent has the author convinced me? Why? or Why not?