What would the bc government argue in response


Problem

The BC government has introduced a vaccine passport, requiring proof of vaccination for non - essential services (such as e.g. gyms, restaurants). The passport is intended to be in place initially for 4 months approximately. For those who wish to challenge the validity of the passport, could they use the Constitution as a basis of that challenge? What would the BC government argue in response?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: What would the bc government argue in response
Reference No:- TGS03309852

Expected delivery within 24 Hours