What prove to court that neuromed was not liable for damages


Discussion Post

The purpose of this discussion is to illustrate Incoterms in a real-world case study. Read the St. Paul Guardian v. Neuromed Case and answer the following questions.

CISG. (2002, March 26). United States 26 March 2002 Federal District court [New York] (St. Paul guardian insurance company et al. v. Neuromed medical systems & support et al.). Electronic Library on International Commercial Law and the CISG.

• If the carrier damaged the MRI, are they responsible? Do they have to pay?

• The contract states CIF New York. Does that mean the seller bought Marine Insurance in the buyer's name and the damage will be covered under that policy?

• Ultimately, what proved to the court that Neuromed was not liable for damages?

• The buyer was lucky. Why?

The response must include a reference list. One-inch margins, double-space, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Supply Chain Management: What prove to court that neuromed was not liable for damages
Reference No:- TGS03099101

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (99%)

Rated (4.3/5)