For both cases this week, we favored limited stakeholders' point of view. We talked a lot about the parents & company for Josh - (they were trying to get perscription drug for Josh but government denied it cause of FDA rules which they created #savejosharmy to try to get kid drugs) and the consumers for Nike (talked about how nike are treating their workers badly in other countries). What other stakeholders could we consider based off this? How does that change your opinions if at all?