Question: P was injured in a bar when a drunk bar customer hit P while fighting with someone else. Both P and the drunk customer are citizens of State X. The bar customer was obviously drunk. P sued the bar owner in state court in State X for negligently serving the customer too much alcohol, which led to P's injuries. The bar is located in State Y and the bar owner is a State Y citizen. The bar owner removed the case to federal court in State X and moved to implead the drunk bar customer for P's claims against the bar owner. The motion to implead the drunk bar customer should be Question options: a) Granted because P should have sued the drunk bar customer. b) Granted because the drunk bar customer is a nonparty who is or may be liable to the bar owner for all or part of P's claims against the bar owner. c) Denied because P decides who to sue and who is liable for their harm, not the bar owner. d) Denied because it would destroy diversity of citizenship subject matter jurisdiction.