What kind of skeptical argument undermined by bouwsma claims


Problem: Bouswma claims that illusions and thick illusions are impossible. Holograms of flowers and mirages of water on a desert highway aren't material in the way paper flowers are. Is Bouwsma's claim plausible if we take immaterial illusions like holograms and mirages into account? What kinds of skeptical arguments are undermined by Bouwsma's claims?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: What kind of skeptical argument undermined by bouwsma claims
Reference No:- TGS03270939

Expected delivery within 24 Hours