Problem
Listen to the BBC Documentary "A Different Kind of Justice". Discuss your overall impressions of the documentary. How does this story challenge the underlying assumptions of the adversarial system? In your response try to answer/address the following questions:
a) Is this outcome 'better' or 'worse' than the courts can offer?
b) After listening to this documentary, have your feelings about what "justice" requires, or might be, changed?
c) Should Canada be moving more in this direction in our criminal law?
d) Crucially, are there limits or obstacles to the approach taken in this case? Are there any potential negative outcomes?