Problem
Whren v. United States
i. What are the relevant facts?
ii. What facts support the claim that the police conducted a pretextual stop?
iii. What is the rule established in Whren?
iv. In your opinion, why did the Court refuse to consider the subjective motivation of the police in considering the reasonableness of the arrest?
v. In your opinion, should the subjective intentions of the police in conducting a stop be considered in considering whether the police acted reasonably? Explain.