Problem
i. In your view, what is the most significant technological development used for law enforcement purposes?
ii. Should there be any limit on the use of technology-based evidence in criminal investigations and prosecutions? If so, what should that be?
iii. Do you believe that Australia's 2-year metadata retention and access laws are appropriate and proportionate?
iv. Do individuals have a right to communicate through the use of encryption?
v. In Honesett, the High Court found that Henneberg's evidence interpreting CCTV footage "gave the unwarranted appearance of science to the prosecution case" and should not have been admitted. As technology continues to advance and become increasingly used in law enforcement, how can courts improve the way they use this evidence to better ensure its reliability?