What is the crux of the research


1. Summary: Give a brief summary of the work by your own word

• What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?

• What are the claimed contributions of the paper?

• How do the authors substantiate their claims?

• What are the conclusions?

2. Evaluating:

Evaluate the work by answering this question:

• Is the research problem significant?

• Are the contributions significant?

• Are the claims valid?

3. Synthesis: generate any interesting thought you have on the work by consulting the following question:

• What is the crux of the research problem?

• What are some alternative approaches to address the research problem?

• What is a better way to substantiate the claim of the authors?

• What is a good argument against the case made by the authors?

• How can the research results be improved?

• Can the research results be applied to another context?

• What are the open problems raised by this work?

• Bottom-line: Can we do better than the authors?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Basic Computer Science: What is the crux of the research
Reference No:- TGS01149101

Now Priced at $50 (50% Discount)

Recommended (99%)

Rated (4.3/5)

A

Anonymous user

5/25/2016 4:43:36 AM

In a word paper, you have to address the following points in order to complete the assignment. 1) Summary: Provide a short summary of the work in your own word. a) Illustrate the research problem the paper tries to address? b) Determine the claimed contributions of the paper? c) Explain how do the authors authenticate their claims? d) Describe the conclusions? 2) Assessing: Assess the work by answering the question. a) Is the research problem important? b) Are contributions important? c) Are the claims valid? 3) Synthesis: Produce any interesting notion you have on the work by consulting the given question: a) Describe the crux of the research problem? b) Determine some alternative approaches to address the research problem? c) What is a better manner to validate the claim of the authors? d) Explain what is a good argument against the case made via the authors?