Problem: In a nutshell, what is the argument against faking nature? Need Assignment Help? Group of answer choices No matter how perfectly nature is restored to its original state, something of value has been "lost," since origin is important as an integral part of the evaluation process Engineers of nature are like forgers of great artworks; they are reprehensible liars There is no argument in principle; plastic trees are just as good as the real thing as long as nobody can tell the difference. Empirically, however, the restoration process will always be inadequate Faking nature is a disruptive process that will inevitably upset the ecological balance of nature, which is bad stewardship