Problem: What is a strength of Dyson's and Duelfer's interview research into understanding analysis of foreign leaders? Is there either (a) a weakness you noticed, or (b) something you would have liked to have known about their methodology that would have helped you assess the validity of their findings? If you had one interview question to incorporate, what would it be? Need Assignment Help?
Directions:
Respond to the prompt.
Your response does not have to be longer than a few sentences, but it should completely answer the prompt. In your responses, you should demonstrate that (a) you have done the readings, and (b) can apply the new concepts from the module to analyze a particular article or security/intelligence topic.
Full citations are only needed if you are citing an article that is not from this week's readings, but if you mention specifics in a reading from this week, indicate the page number.
Readings:
Assessing How the U.S. Intelligence Community Analyzes Foreign Leaders