Write 2-3 paragraph, no need to answer each question,just choose some of them. I will attach the material you need.
The book, in my opinion, does not quite pull through which an application of Nietzsche and Foucault to a discussion of fair compensation, but I think we can infer how their ideas might be applied to the issue.
What do both Nietzsche and Foucault do that Rawls fails to do? How does this alter how we understand the nature of values, including values such as fairness? How does the philosophy of Nietzsche and Foucault call into question the possibility of Rawls' "veil of ignorance"?
What does Nietzsche say about the nature of morality? How does this apply to issues such as fairness?
What does Foucault say about the relationship between power and knowledge?
With regards to the institutions, ways of knowing, and social relations that we, as human beings, all participate in, what do Nietzsche and Foucault recommend that we do?
How might this all be applied to the question of fair compensation?