Quetsion: Part 1 -Computer Forensic; The limits of the truth
What do you do with what you know? Is it sufficient to answer what you re asked or to reveal everything that you know about a particular situation? To what degree does context matter? Imagine that you are engaged by a law firm to examine evidence for the defence. You uncover evidence that does not help your client's case which was not discovered by the prosecution. Later in court you are asked a question that will reveal this evidence if answered fully and truthfully. What will be your response: Do you opt for full disclosure, or do you try to evade the question?
To complete this Paper
Submit an essay in which Come to a decision on how you would respond. Discuss your decision from varying perspectives on how to present the truth. Provide examples to support your decision.
(at least 600 words)
Referencing guideline (Citation style : Harvard-Coventry)
• No wikis, no forums, Quora sites
• Website from reputable sources allowed
• Required to have at least 2 peer reviewed papers
• In-text citation is required for all reference
Part 2 - Computer Forensic; Over the border
Different societies have different perspectives on law and order, privacy and security. Within their territorial borders, nation-states impose these perspectives through a set of laws. The new digital reality calls into question the stability of national boundaries, particularly when it comes to cybercrime. What is against the law in one jurisdiction may not be illegal on the other side of the boundary line.
To complete this Paper:
Post: Discuss the differences of laws in at least two different countries and their impact on computer forensics..(at least 600 words)
Referencing guideline (Citation style : Harvard-Coventry)
• No wikis, no forums, Quora sites
• Website from reputable sources allowed
• Required to have at least 2 peer reviewed papers
• In-text citation is required for all reference