Nadel v. Burger King case
1. What court decided the case in the assignment?
2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment?
3. Briefly state the facts of this case.
4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress?
5. What tort did the court approve?
6. According to the case, why didn't the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims?
7. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?