What are the risks and rewards that delegating independent


Discussion Post

You will learn about the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the often vexed relationship it has with sovereign states. The United States, in particular, has taken a very hostile stance towards the ICC which is currently investigating the possibility of atrocities in Afghanistan. The US argues that because it did not ratify the Treaty of Rome (which established the ICC), the ICC should not be allowed to exercise its authority over US soldiers, even if they are found to have committed a war crime, and has imposed sanctions on members of the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor.

This controversy speaks to a larger question about what the proper relationship should be between international organizations (IOs) and their member states. Should IOs always be subordinate to the interests of their member states? When, if ever, should we invest independent, supranational authority in IOs, especially those dealing with atrocities like genocide and crimes against humanity? What are the risks and rewards that delegating independent authority to an IO creates for governments and for individuals? In light of these questions (and your answers to them), do you think the US should become a full member of the ICC?

The response should include a reference list. Double-space, using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
History: What are the risks and rewards that delegating independent
Reference No:- TGS03104803

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (91%)

Rated (4.3/5)