What are the implications of false or misidentification in


Question: Details

Eyewitness testimony is a fascinating topic among memory researchers, cognitive psychologists, and legal scholars. Key researchers such as Elizabeth Loftus and Gary Wells have been investigating this topic for several years. Their results are fascinating and have even played a role in changing legal procedures. For this discussion assignment, you are to watch part 1 and part 2 of the video clips listed below on the case of Ronald Cotton. After watching the videos, respond to the following discussion questions:

1. What are the implications of false or misidentification in the courtroom?

2. Discuss if you agree or disagree with eyewitness testimony and whether it should be allowed in the courtroom.

3. List 2-3 suggestions for decreasing the problem of false or misidentification.

The Ronald Cotton Case (13:01 & 13.07)

This two-part 60 Minute piece deals with the false imprisonment of Ronald Cotton and the numerous problems encountered in eyewitness testimony.

1. Eyewitness Testimony Part 1 (By CBS News)

2. Eyewitness Testimony Part 2 (By CBS News)

Your original post, in response to the discussion prompt above, should contain a minimum of 125 words, not including restatement of questions or reference sections. Utilize critical thinking, and support your work with additional resources as applicable.

Finally, any content that is paraphrased, summarized or quoted in your discussion post or response must be must be cited using APA format.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Dissertation: What are the implications of false or misidentification in
Reference No:- TGS02832737

Expected delivery within 24 Hours