Discussion Post
Review Standard Bent Glass v. Glassrobots, 333 F.3d 440 (3rd. Cir. 2003). What about this transaction provides support for the applicability of the arbitration clause? Does the Statute of Frauds apply to this transaction? Why or why not? Post your completed response to the case in the main forum.
Your initial post should include evidence from other cases (not Standard Bent Glass v. Glassrobots) that support your decision. Your follow-up discussion should challenge your classmates' findings and defend your own position. Follow-up discussions to classmates' initial responses should integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject; offer a personal observation or experience; reference real-world examples, current events; or present current research on the topic that encourage further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.
The response should include a reference list. Using one-inch margins, Times New Roman 12 pnt font, double-space and APA style of writing and citations.