We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal


We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously.

French philosopher Félix Guattari

What type of fallacy is this and why?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal
Reference No:- TGS02847636

Now Priced at $10 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)