Problem
When Sony released its PlayStation 3 (PS3), it represented that the gaming system (i) connected to the PlayStation Network, (ii) had the ability to run other operating systems, and (iii) was expected to last for over ten years. But the prod-uct's terms of service provided that future updates might disable some functions. Four years later, Sony's software update forced users to choose between features (i) and (ii) listed above. Disgruntled gamers sued, claiming that Sony made an express warranty that the PS3 would work as promised for ten years, but took away a fundamental product feature after only four years. Was Sony's representation an enforceable express warranty?