A worker was dismal for disruptive conduct by his company. The company claimed that he violated its rules No 18 and 29.
18. making false ,Vicious,or malicious statements concerning any employees, Supervisor the company tm products.
29. unlawful, improper, or unseemly conduct on or off thecompany premises or during non working hours which affect the employees relationships tohis or her job to fellow employees relationships to his or to supervisor or affecting the company products.
The employers claimed he dicussed a anti union act of certain of the company manager he wrote and give copy to fellow employees.
Explain if, companyrules NO 18 and 29 violated?
Employees at times write about article or letter for newpaper openly critical of their employers. should this make any different in rhe case of this employee?
was the employees protected under section 7 of the LMRA
Was the employee terminated for rules or his pro unions activities?