Question: Two competing publishers of bar review courses for the Georgia bar exam entered into an agreement in which one agreed not to compete in Georgia, and the other agreed not to compete outside the state of Georgia. As a result, the price to take the course in Georgia increased from $150 to $400. Law students who had contracted to take the Georgia course sued, claiming that the price increase was due to an agreement in violation of the Sherman Act. Are they correct? (Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc., 498 U.S. 46)