Summary of case
Over the years a number of systems have been developed which record coded information across a range of factors about disabilities in ethnic communities. A new coding convention has been developed to rationalise the inconsistent coding conventions of these legacy systems. The new coding convention uses codes which had different meanings in the legacy systems. This means that time series analysis gives inconsistent results, particularly showing both under and over reporting of numbers of particular disability categories. This is significant when making policies for people based on the size of the communities. To fix this would take a lot of work and expense, and management has decreed that historical systems will not be fixed, but new systems will all adopt the new coding convention.
1.2.1 Public Interest
a) identify those potentially impacted by your work and explicitly consider their interests;
d) take into consideration the fact that your profession traverses many other professions, and has implications for other social systems and organisations;
e) endeavour to preserve the integrity, security, continuity and utility of ICT;
1.2.2 Quality of Life
a) recognise, in your work, the role that ICT can play to enhance the quality of life of people, particularly the disadvantaged or those with disabilities;
b) protect and promote the health and safety of those affected by your work;
d) attempt to increase the feelings of personal satisfaction, competence, and control of those affected by your work.
1.2.4 Competence
a) endeavour to provide products and services which match the operational and financial needs of your stakeholders;
e) advise your stakeholders when you believe a proposed project, product or service is not in their best interest;
1.2.6 Professionalism
h) co-operate in advancing ICT by communication with other professionals, students and the public;