Please no plagiarism and please cite your sources. So, the question here is should the experiments in a scientific paper be repeated by another set of researchers before it can be published?
Other possible questions to pursue:
If an experiment cannot be reproduced by another laboratory is it really a discovery?
Is there really a 'reproducibility crisis' in Science?
How important is it that results be replicated/verified?
This group will have half its members support the idea that 'Yes, it is necessary for results to be verified by another lab before they can be published' while the other half will support 'No, it is not necessary for another lab/group to independently verify results before publication is granted'.