Can you think of a sentence which, when negated, says the same thing as the original, non-negated sentence? Or is that impossible? Discuss. Either find such a sentence, or explain why it is impossible to find such a sentence.
The truth of the premises of an argument has nothing to do with how well those premises support the argument's conclusion. Put another way: the truth of the premises has nothing to do with how good those premises are as reasons to believe the conclusion (the claim the argument makes). In a few paragraphs, explain WHY this is so.