The theories are consequentialist theories, normative theories, Egoism, Kant’s theory, utilitarianism and Other nonconsequentialist theories.
Is there any reason to prefer one ethical theory above the rest? What are the best objections to each of the theories, and how could an advocate of the theories defend them from the objections? Identify common ground on which moral decision-making can proceed. In your responnse consider the subtleties of Kan't main formulations of the categorical imperitive including his emphasis on moral motivation and respect for persons.
Your response should be a minimum of 100 words.