Question: The legislature of the state of Iowa, concerned about the proliferation of drugs in American society and their alleged availability even inside the nation's prisons, passed a law allowing prison officials to conduct random blood and urinalysis tests on state correction officers. The law allowed testing without any reasonable suspicion that the officers to be tested were in fact users or under the influence of any controlled substance. A total of 1,750 officers filed a class-action suit challenging the law as a search and seizure without a warrant and as a violation of their due process rights. How should the federal court rule? See McDonell v. Hunter [809 F.2d 1302 (8th Cir. 1987)].