The first question is under : Case 5.3 bad frog berwery, the requirement is What if the facts were different? ( if bad frog had sought to use the offensive label to market toys instead of beer, would the court'a ruling likely have been the same? why or why not ?
The second question is under : Case 6.2 Mayo foundation for medical education and research v. United states , the required is ( the ethical dimension a number of students work full time for their school to pay for their education. is it fair to require them to pay FICA taxes when they would not have to do so it they worked only thirty hours per week? explain.
Attachment:- Case 6.3.rar