The dairy argues that the statute of frauds bars


Dean was hired on February 12 as a sales manager of the Co-op Dairy for a minimum period of one year with the dairy agreeing to pay his moving expenses. By February 26, Dean had signed a lease, moved his family from Oklahoma to Arizona, and reported for work.

After he worked for a few days, he was fired. Dean then brought this action against the dairy for his salary for the year, less what he was paid.

The dairy argues that the statute of frauds bars enforcement of the oral contract because the contract was not to be performed within one year. Is the dairy correct in its assertion?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Management Theories: The dairy argues that the statute of frauds bars
Reference No:- TGS02174612

Expected delivery within 24 Hours