The author discusses three items in the Bill of Rights that he calls the "Great Ought's." By this expression he means that these rights are a. the rights that "ought" to exist but never will because the law cannot specifically spell them out b. the rights that the scriptures teach us all humans "ought" to have c. in the character of "natural rights" and therefore qualify as "oughts" d. rights he thought "ought" to be in the Bill of Rights but were not put there