The appeals court affirmed that the bank was liable for


Case Lor-Mar/ Toto v. Constitution Bank

1) The appeals court affirmed that the bank was liable for cashing the forged check. How could the bank have avoided liability?

 

2) It is common for business to use stamped signatures on checks. Anyone can make a check wih any number on them, so forgery is not difficult. How could a business best avoid possible losses from such an occurrence?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Operation Management: The appeals court affirmed that the bank was liable for
Reference No:- TGS01386948

Expected delivery within 24 Hours