The analyzing the meaning of the arguments is very important for any critical thinking. Though it may sound unimportant or even immaterial to carry up such essential matters as talking, communication, and meaning these are the majority fundamental workings of the arguments even extra basic than inferences, propositions, and conclusions. We cannot construct common sense of an argument devoid of being capable make logic of the meaning, language, and purpose of what is creature converse in the initial place (Salmon, M.H., 2013).
Language is a slight and multifaceted utensil used to communicate a hard to believe number of dissimilar things, other than for our reason at this time we are able to decrease the world of announcement to four fundamental categories: emotion, direction, ceremony and information. The initial two are frequently extravagances together for the reason that they articulate cognitive connotation while the concluding two usually express moving meaning.
2. Recognizing the arguments and evaluating their strengths.
Evaluating the strengths of the arguments is very important. To evaluate the argument is a method of shaping the truth. The deductive arguments set up conclusions by means of confidence, at the same time as the inductive arguments set up conclusions by means of changeable probability. A disagreement is convincing (containing the probability of certainty) when it watches the subsequent rules: the building is correct, they are applicable to the wrapping up, and the building provide good grounds to agree to the conclusion like true. A misleading notion is committed at what times an argument shatter individual of these three systems, so with the meaning of the building fail to hold up the conclusion.
3. Recognizing and avoiding fallacies.
The fallacies are the defects in the reasoning which lead to irrational statements. Although the logical fallacies are inclined to happen when the ideas are being quarreled, they are talented to be originated in every types of inscription. The majority of the logical fallacies pretense as rational statements, excluding they're in the fact attempts to influence the readers by tempting to their sentiment as an alternative of their intelligence, their hearts relatively after that their heads (Mulnix, J. W. 2010). The names through which the logical fallacies are recognized indicate the manner that critical thinking has disappeared wrong.
4. Making decisions in light of available information or evidence.
It is very important that we have the ability and skills to understand the available information and evidences and make the final decisions on the basis of these evidences and the information available. This is one of the fact that is necessary and all the process that we have discussed above is useless if we don't have the ability to make the decisions on the basis and light of the information and evidences available because the end purpose of all the process is to make the right decision but if we are not able to make the right decision then all the above steps are useless and we will not benefit from this process at all.
2. Give an example of how you might apply one or more of these keys to good critical thinking.
The first thing that I will apply to any argument is the understanding of the meaning of the argument as it is the meaning of the argument that will help us carry out the other steps quite successfully. For example, if the finance department says that we should take more loans because we have the opportunities to invest and earn more profits. The first thing that will be necessary is to understand this argument. The next thing that we will do is to analyze and evaluate this argument by the way of the information that is available to us. Then I will make the decision if the argument is proved right then the decision will be to get more loan and invest.
B. Critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions
1. Factors that are Keys to draw a valid conclusion
1. Finding the truth if the premises
The truth of all the premises involved in any argument is very important for the drawing of the valid conclusions. So we will first have to identify whether all the premises are true or fallacies. If there are the entire premises are true then we will move forward for the conclusion (Mulnix, J. W. 2010).
2. A valid conclusion needs right kind of support from the premises
After we have identified the right kind of premises then we can draw a conclusion with the right kind of support from all the premises. The conclusion can be drawn on the basis of the premises if we can use them in the right way (Salmon, M.H., 2013).
2. Give an example of how you might apply one or more of these keys to successfully drawing valid conclusions.
When we have all the premises that are truth or fallacies we first have determine whether it is truth or fallacies. One the example may be that if the statement or the evidence is based on the fact or it is an opinion. First we have to identify that for an opinion or fact. If the evidence is a fact then it will be true and we cannot argue much against it and there is a conclusion already found in but if it is an opinion then the conclusion may be varying as we can argue on it. For example I have an opinion that the urging somebody for suicide is a murder itself. But any one can argue against this statement and the conclusion on this opinion may be varying for different individuals.
C. Critical success factors in analyzing arguments
1. Factors that are keys to successfully analyzing an argument.
1. Identification of indicator words
The indicator words are very important in order to understand and analyze an argument and these are the words that will indicate that when the individual is going to say his conclusion to the argument. So firstly we have to understand the indicators words. So identifying the indicator words is very important for finding and conclusions about the analyzing the argument (Mulnix, J. W. 2010).
2. Recognizing generalization and their types
The arguments are sometimes generalized and there is a need for the recognizing the generalization of the arguments and the types of these generalization. The arguments may include universal or statistical generalizations (Salmon, M.H., 2013). We have to first identify these generalizations and then the type of these generalizations.
3. Evaluation of conclusion of argument
After we have identified the generalizations and their types w can then evaluate the conclusion drawn from the arguments on the basis of these generalizations. We will need the right kind of support from these generalizations (Mulnix, J. W. 2010).
4. Judging the evidence for the argument
In the end we will try to look for the evidences for the argument to find out whether there is any valid evidence to support these arguments. The argument that has valid evidence will be valid argument and vice versa.
5. Give an example of how you might apply one or more of these keys to successfully analyzing arguments.
The argument may be analyzed for the validity if we have identified all the key indicator words for the argument then we can analyze the argument to a great extent. The second thing that we can apply to the argument analyzing is the looking for some evidences related to the argument. For example if we an argument that that the urging somebody for suicide is a murder itself. Then we will check for the evidences whether are any valid evidences for this argument or not. If there is any valid evidence that is supporting these arguments then we can say the argument is valid and if there is no proper evidence then we can say that the argument is not valid.