Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment (Evaluation, critical review)
Order Description:
Criteria for evaluating scientific articles:
1. Theory:
a. The theoretical background is well described.
b. The key-concepts are well-defined
c. The study addresses one or more clearly formulated research questions.
d. The research question(s) lead(s) to clear and testable hypotheses.
2. Methodology:
a. The experimental setup and design are adequate for testing the hypotheses at hand.
b. The number of participants and repetitions provide sufficient statistical power.
c. The method of experimentation is clearly described, allowing for replication.
d. The data-reduction is clearly described, allowing for replication
e. The statistical methods used are appropriate for testing the hypotheses at hand.
3. Results:
a. The collected data and results are presented in a clear and accessible manner.
b. The statistical results are described in an adequate manner.
c. The presentation of the results is coherent with the research question(s) at hand.
4. Conclusions and interpretation
a. The conclusions drawn on the basis of the results and their interpretation are adequate.
b. The research question(s) is (are) being answered.
c. The hypotheses are being rejected or confirmed based on adequate reasoning.
d. The implications for the theory are discussed