Suppose that at trial hanousek argued that he could not be


Question: 1. Can Hanousek be convicted of a crime under these circumstances? (yes or no) Why or why not?

2. Suppose that at trial, Hanousek argued that he could not be convicted because he did not know about the requirements of the Clean Water Act. Would this defense be successful? (yes or no) Why or why not?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Suppose that at trial hanousek argued that he could not be
Reference No:- TGS02671977

Expected delivery within 24 Hours