Consider the Chapter 6 materials on both private property and environmental justice, in the context of what you know about natural gas fracking and global climate change. (If you are not familiar with these issues, please conduct appropriate research online). In your opinion, why are we debating "whether" fracking is harmful and "whether" global climate change is occurring rather than debating what can and must be done about the environmental impact? Find specific examples of online resources that both support the environmental perspectives and deny the environmental consequences; describe the factors that implicate the credibility of the sources. Start with Mr. Anderson's discussion and his company's performance (see the TED Talk from the Youtube video link noted in Resources). How do you view this debate? What principles guide you? What ethical theories guide you in determining which policy should be advanced? Your post should be at least 6 paragraphs.
Review the Youtube video again under "Readings and Resources" and consider the Chapter 7 R.J. Reynolds case. Clearly, in Indonesia, the tobacco companies are engaging in business practices that are profitable and not prohibited by law. The R.J.Reynolds case demonstrates the tobacco companies' views on advertising and providing warnings. What ethical theories support their activities? Which theories do not? What principles guide you? What ethical theories guide you? Your post should be at least 6 paragraphs. https://youtu.be/7taArbuni90.