Should these parties reach an agreement why or why not what


Details:

Refer to "Negotiating on Thin Ice."

Create a paper of 1,000-1,250 words that includes an introduction and conclusion that make relevant connections to course objectives and addresses the following questions:

Should these parties reach an agreement? Why or why not?

What were the barriers to reaching a negotiated agreement (psychological, structural, and tactical)?

Should Bettman and Goodenow be the ones to anticipate and overcome any barriers?

What power moves were used by each party?

What were the limits of each party's power?

What is each side's BATNA?

For the players, is the agreement better or worse than the final offer they received prior to the season's cancellation?

Which was apparent in this case, distributive or integrative bargaining?

Could the final agreement have been reached earlier, thus avoiding the cancellation of the season? Give reasons for your opinion.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Operation Management: Should these parties reach an agreement why or why not what
Reference No:- TGS01627201

Now Priced at $50 (50% Discount)

Recommended (99%)

Rated (4.3/5)