Sharon wanted a video camera so she could record her son's soccer games and birthday parties. Reliable TV, a retailer, sold a digital video recorder to Sharon. The recorder has a one year warranty. Sharon paid with a negotiable promissory note. Later, Reliable TV properly negotiated and sold Sharon's note to First Finance Co, Sharon's recorder broke six months after she bought it. Reliable TV failed to honor its warranty, so SDharon stopped making payments on the note. First Finance has sued to force Sharon to pay on the the note it bought from Reliable TV. The outcome of this case is that:
A) First Finance wins if at the time it took the note it was a holder in due course.
B) First Finance wins because a proper negotiation cuts off any defenses against payment that the maker (Sharon) had.
C) First Finance loses because Sharon is a consumer
D) None of the above is correct
Explain how you came to your conclusion